Michelangelo, Rondinini Pietà (16th century) |
One participant told of losing several close family members
to AIDS, and of being HIV positive himself. Another told of her loneliness, the
complexity of giving and receiving sexual love in a time of AIDS, her longing
to be held and touched. We heard about suicidal darkness and bereavement, but
also about the wonder of finding joy in life’s smallest blessings – a flower,
the shape of a cloud – gathering ‘five small delights each day to make a
handful of hope’. We heard about mothers weeping over their dead children,
refusing to be consoled, and about the joy of becoming a mother in spite of the virus. We heard about lovers driven to the point of
exhaustion by caring for their dying partners, and of the aching loss that
followed those partners’ deaths. We heard about the shock of receiving the
diagnosis, and the long dark struggle to accept and adapt.
But we also heard about stigmatisation and rejection, about
fear and denial. We heard people who had experienced a deep sense of shame and
self-loathing, a dread of making their condition known. We heard too many
stories of churches that rejected sufferers on account of their ‘sins’, or
refused to allow a space where it was possible to speak and be heard about what
it means to live with HIV/AIDS.
A woman told of how she had left the Church when she
received her diagnosis, only to return many years later when she found a
welcoming community who accepted her fully as the person she was, a person who
happened to have a virus. That was repeated several times – HIV is a virus. It
should not be a condition that sets a person apart from all others because of
some unmentionable shame or secret. She spoke of being a Eucharistic minister:
‘I, a body identified with the leper, the outcast, the untouchable, am offering
the body and blood of Christ the victim.’
As I listened and reflected throughout the day, I found
myself experiencing an inversion of thought. These were all people who spoke as
if they were somehow on the margins of the Church, dependent on those in the
centre to receive them and welcome them, to allow them to live as part of the
body of Christ. I thought of what it means to place one’s faith in the Word
made Flesh, and I realized that it is the people who are marginalised by the
self-righteous, the worthy, the pious and the fully included, who are the
Church. Theirs are the bodies we must embrace if we are to incarnate our
prayers and sacraments in the Body of Christ. It is not for us to accept them.
We must ask to be accepted by them. It is not for us to forgive them. We must
ask to be forgiven by them. We have nothing to teach and everything to learn,
from those who have been called to travel the desolate and lonely path that
leads through fear, rejection and abandonment to Calvary – a path that any of
us might tread one day, whether through illness, loss or ageing, or through the
unthinkable catastrophes that can visit themselves upon a life. Those who have
gone ahead of us offer wisdom, shine a light and create a space of warmth and
courage within the terror of that cold, dark path of sorrow and sickness.
To say this is not to glorify suffering. It is not to
indulge in that obscene suggestion that another person’s suffering is
purposeful because it helps to make us compassionate or good or loving. Why
should another human being experience dereliction in order to teach me how to
love? In one of Simone
Weil’s reflections she contemplates the utter desolation of the abjected
and degraded person deprived of all dignity and beauty. Stripping away the
sentimentality of cheap love, she asks us to consider what it means to say to
that person, ‘Who art thou?’ This, she says, only happens in those who have
cultivated the habit of attentiveness
Those who are unhappy have no need for anything in this world but people capable of giving them attention. The capacity to give one’s attention to a sufferer is a very rare and difficult thing. It is almost a miracle. It is a miracle. Nearly all those who think they have this capacity do not possess it. Warmth of heart, impulsiveness, pity are not enough.
Maggie Ross is an Anglican hermit who spends much of her time
living in the snowy wilderness of Alaska. Her book, Writing the Icon of the Heart: In Silence Beholding, is an extended reflection on the biblical word
‘Behold’, which tends to be translated as ‘look’ or ‘see’ in a way that takes
away its depth of meaning. Beholding is our ability to remain open to all that
is revealed to us of God through creation, which requires a form of
attentiveness and stillness far beyond what we normally understand by words
such as ‘looking’ and ‘seeing’. It is the attentive gaze of the inner eye of
the soul on the grace of God manifest in the mystery of creation. It calls us
out of our solipsistic loneliness and narcissism, and draws us towards the
abyss of encounter and silence that constitute our human knowing of God. Ross
writes that ‘Silence is context and end, beholding the means. In the final
analysis, this is all we need to know’. The silence that we experience as ‘the
vast interior landscape that invites us to stillness’ allows us to enter into
the presence of the Other through the sense of awareness that comes from
beholding.
Beholding and attentiveness – these are the lost arts of
insight and discernment in a culture where we flee from silence and solitude
with endless technological gadgets and gimmicks. Crowding out the empty spaces,
we no longer know how to behold, to say to the other in all her vulnerability
and desire: ‘Who art thou?’, knowing that that question also puts us into
positions of vulnerability and desire that we do not control.
To behold is to be holding, to be held and to be beholden. It is to
open ourselves to embrace the world in all its fragility and sorrow, in all its
hope and meaning. It is to overcome fear – that most crippling of emotions from
which flows all anger, hatred, violence and envy. ‘Do not be afraid’ is the
angelic exhortation that comes to us on wings of prayer and seeds within us the
vulnerability of the newborn God. It is the exhortation that calls us to stand
with the one who suffers on Calvary, being there in helpless solidarity before
the darkened horizons of death. It is the call that quickens our steps and
leads us through the early darkness of the city to the tomb of the risen Christ,
where with Mary Magdalene we must discover what it means to let go, to
relinquish our clinging in order to open ourselves to the billowing abyss of
the body that is not there for He is Risen. Yet still he comes among us in every body that
cries out, ‘I thirst’ to an indifferent and terrified world.
Love bade me welcome. Yet my soul drew
back
Guilty of dust and sin.
But
quick-eyed Love, observing me grow slack
From my first entrance in,
From my first entrance in,
Drew
nearer to me, sweetly questioning,
If I lacked any thing.
If I lacked any thing.
A
guest, I answered, worthy to be here:
Love
said, You shall be he.
I
the unkind, ungrateful? Ah
my dear,
I cannot look on thee.
Love
took my hand, and smiling did reply,
Who made the eyes but I?
Who made the eyes but I?
Truth
Lord, but I have marred them: let my shame
Go where it doth deserve.
And
know you not, says Love, who bore the blame?
My dear, then I will serve.
My dear, then I will serve.
You must sit down, says Love, and taste
my meat:
So I did sit and
eat.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments and contributions are welcome so long as they respect the rules of courtesy and respect, which is not to inhibit robust disagreement.