Showing posts with label Mary Colwell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mary Colwell. Show all posts

Saturday, 2 January 2010

Asking forgiveness of the birds





This is the outlook from Fairlie, a village on the Firth of Clyde where my mother lives. The glorious view includes this shipping terminal, built in the 1970s for shipments of iron ore, here silhouetted against the snow-covered island of Arran. It would be easy to rage against this industrial intrusion in a space of such natural magnificence, but it also has a strange kind of beauty. There is a nuclear power station a little further along the coast - Hunterston B. So this is a place on the edge of things, somewhere liminal, perched on the very brink of a wilderness of sea and sky, but still bearing the deep gouge of our human presence. Is this a violation, or is it in some sense also part of the natural environment, an expression of the kind of animal we are perhaps? But if so, how can our species learn to adapt so that others might live? On these bitterly cold winter nights, it seems romantic in the extreme to lament the industries which brings us light and warmth, but surely our human genius can find a better way of doing all this, if only there was the will?

Walking along the shore yesterday evening, I saw a curlew and I thought of my friend Mary Colwell, whose blog is called 'Reflections of a Curlew'. It was a solitary curlew, feeding among the plovers and the gulls and other birds which I can't identify. One New Year's resolution might be to learn to recognise more birds. I came home and looked up 'curlew' on the RSPB website, where I learned that 'there have been worrying breeding declines in many areas due to loss of  habitat through agricultural intensification'. On Mary's website, I learn that curlews were once blessed by St. Beuno.We no longer understand such acts of blessing and grace between humans and creatures, and yet if we don't rediscover them, what hope is there?

In today's Guardian there are reviews of two books related to such thoughts. The poet John Burnside has written an autobiographical account of how his turn to solitude and nature allowed him to escape his addictions to drugs and alcohol. The book is called Waking Up in Toytown, and in her review Aida Edemariam (wonderful name) quotes his 'sober, thrilled meditation on "the roads, all that God-in-the-details of the land: the sway of cottonwood in the wind, the black of a secluded lake, the monumental quiet of a Monterey cypress near a roadside motel on the way from nothing to nowhere", or the "gloaming just beyond the hedge, where the night begins".'

There's another review by Mary Midgley on the same page, of Ian McGilchrist's The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. Burnside discovered that he had to listen to the voices which played in his mind rather than trying to silence them - 'To ignore the voices is to be chased by them (into the pub, more often than not); to try to forget that he believes in what he calls the afterlife, in which "the dead we once knew ... will go on forever, or some element of them will, folding endlessly into rain and leaves and new animals hunting in the first grey of dawn".' McGilchrist argues that modern culture conditions us to privilege the left side of the brain - the side which is concerned with particularity and practicality - at the expense of the expansive vision and intuitive insights of the right side, so that we have become captive to a dualist vision which has all but destroyed our capacity to see meaning and transcendence in the world. There is surely a deep connection between these two thinkers - the poet and the philosopher, the one learning to live with the voices which speak to him of other worlds, the other analysing what has gone wrong with our culture that we no longer allow such intuitions space in our minds.

I love these serendipitous connections between texts and worlds. I'm reading The Brothers Karamazov, and today I read the chapter on 'Talks and Homilies of the Elder Zosima'. Here is an edited extract of the passage that lingers now in my thoughts:

‘Love all of God’s creation, both the whole of it and every grain of sand. Love every leaf, every ray of God’s light. Love animals, love plants, love each thing. If you love each thing, you will perceive the mystery of God in things. Once you have perceived it, you will begin tirelessly to perceive more and more of it every day. And you will come at last to love the whole world with an entire, universal love. Love the animals: God gave them the rudiments of thought and an untroubled joy. Do not trouble it, do not torment them, do not take their joy from them, do not go against God’s purpose. Man, do not exalt yourself above the animals: they are sinless, and you, you with your grandeur, fester the earth by your appearance on it, and leave your festering trace behind you – alas, almost every one of us does! ... My young brother asked forgiveness of the birds: it seems senseless, yet it is right, for all is like an ocean, all flows and connects; touch it in one place and it echoes at the other end of the world. Let it be madness to ask forgiveness of the birds, still it would be easier for the birds, and for a child, and for any animal near you, if you yourself were more gracious than you are now, if only by a drop, still it would be easier. All is like an ocean, I say to you. Tormented by universal love, you, too, would then start praying to the birds, as if in a sort of ecstasy, and entreat them to forgive you your sin. Cherish this ecstasy, however senseless it may seem to people.'

Maybe that will be my New Year's resolution: to ask forgiveness of the birds and to learn to cherish the ecstasy of praying to the birds. That surely is a form of prayer which comes from the right side of the brain, and which requires us to listen to rather than run away from the voices that haunt us.


Sunday, 29 November 2009

Empathy, attention and creation

At the risk of this becoming a mutual admiration society, I'm excited that Mary Colwell is using her blog to reflect on and develop some of the ideas we've shared about church, creation and empathy. I woke up this morning - the first Sunday of Advent - and realized how my thinking has changed over the years. First, there's been a shift away from an anthropocentric sense of the incarnation - Christ became human for humans - towards a more cosmic sense which sees the incarnation as a weaving of the divine life into the quarks and atoms of all that is, in order to gather everything in to participate in the dynamic love of God. Second, Mary has encouraged me to reflect upon the importance of an environmental awareness that is nurtured and sustained by beauty, joy and hope rather than by guilt, misery and despair.

So often, environmentalists are doom-mongers and purveyors of guilt and gloom. My response - am I alone in this? - is 'sod it, eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die.' I had to travel up to Glasgow last week and decided to go by train instead of flying. On the return journey to Bristol, I had to change trains at Birmingham New Street - a modern purgatory of dark underground platforms, the stink of diesel and the continuous belch and roar of trains, and over it all the worst public announcement system I've ever heard, with a manufactured voice that emits a stream of Big Brother type announcements and warnings using the personal pronoun until I for one could throttle that non-existent 'I': 'I am sorry to announce that the 7.15 train to Bristol is 10 minutes late. Please listen for further announcements.' 'I am sorry to announce that the 7.15 train to Bristol is 20 minutes late. Please listen for further announcements.' 'Please do not leave baggage unattended in this station at any time.' 'I am sorry to announce that the 7.15 train to Bristol is 40 minutes late. Please listen for further announcements.' 'This is a reminder that this is a non-smoking station. Please do not smoke anywhere in this station.' 'I am sorry to announce that the 7.15 train to Bristol is 50 minutes late. Please listen for further announcements.' 'This is a platform alteration. The 7.15 train to Bristol which was due to leave from Platform 11 is now leaving from Platform 5.' 'I am sorry to announce that the 7.15 train to Bristol has been cancelled.' etc. etc. If the world is doomed anyway, who would want to squander these last precious moments of life at Birmingham New Street? Next time, I'll fly to Glasgow. Such are the thoughts of a reluctant and guilty environmentalist.

But we need to widen our horizons, so that our care for the environment is not a meagre and half-hearted response to guilt but a passion for life in all its vast mystery, extravagance and complexity, inspired by the wonder of this creation and our place within it. My conversations with Mary have coincided with my reading Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologiae and realizing how narrow and impoverished our modern understanding of God and creation has become, compared to the magnificence of that medieval vision which shows us a cosmos animated by desire, created and sustained in the dynamic love of its creator, and orientated in all its yearnings and movements towards the source and the destination of its being in God. Mary's idea of empathy feeds into that sense of a harmonious creation sustained by an organic life force that holds in being all that is, and that endows the human animal with a transcendent consciousness capable of imagination, of wonder, of empathy, of creativity.

Simone Weil wrote a wonderful essay called 'Reflections on the Right Use of School Studies with a View to the Love of God'. She focuses on the quality of attention as a necessary prerequisite of study and prayer, and she writes that will power 'has practically no place in study. The intelligence can only be led by desire. For there to be desire, there must be pleasure and joy in the work. The intelligence only grows and bears fruit in joy.' She goes on to link the idea of attention to neighbourly love: 'The love of our neighbour in all its fullness simply means being able to say to him or her: “What are you going through?” It is a recognition that the sufferer exists, not only as a unit in a collection, or a specimen from the social category labelled “unfortunate,” but as a human being, exactly like us, who was one day stamped with a special mark by affliction. For this reason it is enough, but it is indispensable, to know how to look at him or her in a certain way. This way of looking is first of all attentive. The soul empties itself of all its own contents in order to receive into itself the being it is looking at, in all that being's truth. Only one who is capable of attention can do this.'

This is surely that capacity for empathy to which Mary refers, and we can no longer confine it only to the human. We need to cultivate an attentive vision that can gaze deeply into creation until we learn to ask, 'What are you going through?', and that can hear the voice of wounded grace speaking to us in the rhythms and sounds and patterns of nature. In another essay called 'Love of the Order of the World', Weil writes, 'The beauty of the world is the co-operation of divine wisdom in creation. God created the universe and his Son, our first-born brother, created the beauty of it for us. The beauty of the world is Christ's tender smile for us coming through mattter.'

And so to Advent - to the wounded beauty that awaits our human response, to the tender smile of the newborn God.

Tonight he comes,
shining like starlight
through aeons of space,
singing like whale song
through oceans of time.

Tonight he comes,
surging and surfing
the wind and the tides,
leaping and dancing
through forests of flame.

Tonight he comes,
the lover, the baby,
the carpenter God,
sculpting his form
in the wood of the world.